It
is more harmful to compromise one's own beliefs than to adhere to them
Write
a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with
the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In
developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the
statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations
shape your position.
The mind of an individual
is molded by two chief factors: first, which is happening inside us, and
second, the activities in the outer realm we live in. When faced with situations
that call for our subtleness to discern which faculty to involve, we find often
find our own beliefs taking part in a superior manner. Thus, adhering to our
beliefs often prove less harmful than compromising them.
Many a times, importance
given to one’s own self supersedes any other parameters, be it in taking
decisions or undertaking a new venture. What we firmly believe makes us an
individual- an individual who is superior to any other forces around. Such is
the power of individuality, which has often witnessed the test of time and
place, and has grown stronger and stronger with our gradual living of life.
What we accumulate in our life span - education, knowledge, reasoning
capabilities, pragmatism and wisdom, forms the basis of our strong individuality.
Thus, our lives are so deeply rooted in our own understanding that many a
times, it becomes the paramount factor to rely on our own senses and beliefs.
But what happens when
situations beckon us to abandon our beliefs and force us to resort to steps
which our conscience battles against? When comprising such held beliefs prove
unwarranted, we lose the guidance that our own moral self provides us in the
long run, we lose self-control, our own righteousness, and the ability to trust
in our own selves. Adhering to our own beliefs paves us a path of guidance,
shows us the way of development and leading life that we find and believe to be
the best of all approaches and provides us with encouragement. Instead of
allowing our decisions to be muddied by external forces, we can solely rely on
our individual self for actions. Thus, to adhere to our beliefs proves more
advantageous, and is hence less harmful than forsaking them.
On the contrary, do we
have a specific model to ascertain that our beliefs and our thinking is
correct, morally acceptable and does not flout basic norms? It is then when it
becomes wiser not to adhere strongly to stringent beliefs, which might have
harmful repercussions, to one’s own self as well as to people or situations in
general. This can be seen from the tyranny commanded by Hitler, his stringent
insular beliefs, his racism and intolerance against Jews, which ultimately
brought about his downfall. Holding to one’s belief is nevertheless wise, it
however becomes fatuous when such beliefs goes beyond one’s individuality and
affect our environment otherwise.
For developing a holistic individuality, we must rely thoroughly
on our judgement and perceive the situations in which we are placed, and hence
decide whether sticking to our own beliefs, or taking into account external
factors and comprising our individual faculties will be wiser. Strengthening
our own trust in our beliefs is better than compromising them, but it comes
with caveats.
No comments
Post a Comment